Navigation Menu Link to Home Page link to Information on the Divison Link to Staff name, telephone and e-mail link to Topic Index Link to Frequently Asked Questions Link to Hot Topics Link to Training Calendar Link to Area Agencies on Aging Links to other Aging Sites Click to e-mail webmaster Link to the Department of Health and Human Services Disclaimer

Contact
Mary Edwards for a
list of delegates
by county

Additional
Information

North Carolina Division of Aging and Adult Services

Senior Tar Heel Legislature

2002 Legislative Priorities

  • Priority 1: Maintain Home and Community Care Block Grant services for impaired older adults at the current level.
  • Need for Legislative Action: In-home and community-based services help impaired older adults stay in their homes. Key services include home delivered meals, adult day care/day health care, in-home aide, and respite care for family caregivers. As the older population continues to grow, particularly the 85+ population which is more likely to need these services, so does the demand for services. Current resources are not adequate to meet the demand. Although increased funding has been earmarked for in-home and community-based services since 1995, there are currently over 10,000 older adults on waiting lists for key services such as in-home aide services and home delivered meals. An additional $1.3 million is needed to provide a 3% inflationary increase in order to maintain services at the current level.

  • Priority 2: Take steps to ensure that the Medicaid Community Alternatives Program for Disabled Adults (CAP/DA) remains a viable services for older and disabled adults in our state and that our Medicaid program is strengthened to further serve low income seniors.

    Need for Legislative Action: The Medicaid Community Alternatives Program for Disabled Adults (CAP/DA) is one of four programs under Medicaid which provides home and community care as a cost-effective alternative to institutionalization. The program, which was implemented in 1982, provides a package of services to allow disabled adults age 18 and older who qualify for nursing home care to remain in their private residences. In SFY 2001, the program served 12,901 people at less cost than nursing home care. Two recent studies, the Lewin Group’s "North Carolina Medicaid Benefits Study" and the North Carolina Institute of Medicine’s "Long Term Care Plan for North Carolina" expound the worthiness and cost-saving nature of CAP/DA. Because of the budget shortfall in the Medicaid program, a freeze was placed on the CAP/DA program effective October 1, 2001. Due to this freeze, individuals who would prefer to stay in their homes may now be forced into more expensive institutional placement. The freeze is a step backwards in the state’s efforts to allow disabled adults choices in their care options and in the state’s efforts to promote a continuum of long term care services. The freeze is also not consistent with the state’s efforts to adhere to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Omlstead decision.

    Older and disabled adults in our state with monthly income over $738 can not qualify for Medicaid without meeting a "deductible" or "spend down". In order to meet a "spend down", a person must incur medical bills equaling or exceeding the difference between their countable monthly income and $242 which is the medically needy income limit. Older and disabled adults can also not qualify for Medicaid if their countable assets exceed $2000. We are well aware of the budget challenges facing our state, however, we believe that the state needs to address the limitations on the medically needy income limit and the asset level for older and disabled adults.

  • Priority 3: Examine the issue of workforce shortages among paraprofessionals and professionals serving older adults and people with disabilities.

    Need for Legislative Action: North Carolina is in the midst of a long-term care workforce crisis. Efforts to design a long-term care system that ensures the availability of services and high quality care are meaningless unless there is a supply of trained professional and paraprofessional staff – including nurse aides, nurses, physicians, dentists, and allied health professionals. North Carolina is projected to need an additional 30,850 direct care workers between 1998 and 2008. We encourage the General Assembly to address the workforce shortage issue and propose solutions for addressing this critical problem.

  • Priority 4: Pass legislation to strengthen consumer protections to the citizens of North Carolina with special focus on the areas of telemarketing fraud, identity theft, credit practices, and home repair scams and study increasing civil and criminal penalties for those who financially exploit older adults.

    Need for Legislative Action: Consumer fraud, particularly fraudulent practices targeted to older adults, is a growing problem. Residents of our state loose millions of dollars each year as a result of fraud and scams. In a one-week period, the Telemarketing Fraud Prevention Project in the Attorney General’s Office detected eight different telemarketing fraud "hits" on seniors with total payments amounting to $145,000. Consumer protections need to be strengthened and penalties for those who financially exploit seniors need to be increased. At this time, deceptive trade practice cases brought before the Attorney General in state civil court under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (G.S. 75-1.1) are limited to civil penalties up to a maximum of $5000 per violation.

  • Priority 5: Examine the biases which favor institutional placement over home and community based care for older adults and people with disabilities.

    Need for Legislative Action: The Long-Term Care Plan for North Carolina submitted to the General Assembly in January of 2001 states that the state’s long-term care policy should be to support older adults and people with disabilities and their families in making their own choices with regard to living arrangements and long-term care services that will result in appropriate, high quality, cost effective care provided in the least restrictive environment. At this time, there are many biases in our current system which favor institutional placement thereby reducing the choices that older and disabled adults and their families have. These biases need to be addressed.


    Last update - October 1, 2002

 

image of a vertical line

Image of Senior Tar Heel Legislature Logo